ABSTRACT
Objective:To investigate the classification of main pancreatic duct and treatment strategy after linear stapler closure of pancreatic neck in laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD).Methods:The records of 51 consecutive patients with LPD who were treated by linear staple closure technique of pancreatic neck from February to December 2022 from Binzhou Second People′s Hospital, Shijingshan Campus, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Rizhao Hepatobiliary-Pancreatic-Splenic Surgery Research Institute, Chaoyang Central Hospital, Shandong Juxian People′s Hospital, Weihai Municipal Hospital, Binzhou Central Hospital, and Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng University were retrospectively reviewed. According to the visibility, position and diameter of the main pancreatic duct at the stump of the pancreas, the type of main pancreatic duct was divided into type I, type Ⅱ, type Ⅲa and type Ⅲb. The number of cases in each main pancreatic duct classification and the corresponding treatment strategies were examined.Results:A total of 51 cases of LPD were successfully completed. Of these patients, the males comprised 56.9%(29/51), and females comprised 43.1%(22/51), with age ranging from 31 to 88 years old. The type of the main pancreatic duct at the stump of the pancreas included 7 cases (13.7%) of type Ⅰ, 39 cases (76.5%) of type Ⅱ, 2 cases (3.9%) of type Ⅲa, and 3 cases (5.9%) of type Ⅲb. Corresponding treatment strategies were adopted according to different main pancreatic duct types, the main pancreatic duct was successfully found, and a support drainage tube was inserted.Conclusion:After linear stapler closure of pancreatic neck, corresponding treatment strategies should be adopted according to the classification of the main pancreatic duct, which would help to improve the success rate of finding the main pancreatic duct and placing a support drainage tube.
ABSTRACT
Pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ) is an important component of pancreatic surgery such as pancreaticoduodenectomy. It is not only a technical difficulty, but also a common site for serious complications such as postoperative pancreatic fistula. In order to better adapt to the new requirements of the laparoscopic era, simplify PJ, and improve its quality, the author′s team innovatively applied the pancreatic neck linear stapler closure technology to pancreatic transection, and applied continuous single-layer suture technology to PJ, achieving satisfactory initial results. This article proposes the technical details of high-quality PJ by analyzing its common complications and their mechanisms, and elaborates on the rationality of pancreatic neck linear stapler closure combined with continuous single-layer PJ.
ABSTRACT
Objective: To explore the differences of short-term outcomes and quality of life (QoL) for gastric cancer patients between totally laparoscopic total gastrectomy using an endoscopic linear stapler and laparoscopic-assisted total gastrectomy using a circular stapler. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted. Clinicopathological data of patients with stage I to III gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy from January 2017 to January 2020 were retrospectively collected. Those who were ≥80 years old, had serious complications that could affect the quality of life, underwent multi-organ resections, palliative surgery, emergency surgery due to gastrointestinal perforation, obstruction, bleeding, died or lost to follow-up within 1 year after surgery were excluded. A total of 130 patients were enrolled and divided into circular stapler group (CS group, 77 cases) and linear stapler group (LS group, 53 cases) according to the surgical method. The differences of age, gender, body mass index, number of comorbidities, history of abdominal surgery, ASA, tumor location, degree of differentiation, tumor length, tumor T stage, tumor N stage, tumor pathological stage and preoperative quality of life between the two groups were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). The observation indicators: (1) Surgery and postoperative conditions. (2) Postoperative complications: Any adverse conditions that require conservative treatment or surgical intervention after surgery were defined as postoperative complications, of which, complications occurring within 30 days after surgery were defined as early complications; complications occurring within 30 days to 1 year after surgery were defined as late complications. (3) Postoperative quality of life was assessed by the quality of life core scale (QLQ-C30) and gastric cancer specific module scale (QLQ-STO22). The higher the scores of functional scales and global health status, the better the corresponding quality of life. The higher the scores of symptoms scales, the worse the corresponding quality of life. Results: (1) Surgery and postoperative conditions: Compared with the CS group, the LS group presented less intraoperative blood loss [50.0 (50.0-100.0) ml vs. 100.0 (100.0-100.0) ml, Z=-3.111, P=0.002] and earlier time to flatus [(3.1±0.8) days vs. (3.5±1.1) days, t=-2.490, P=0.014]. However, there were no statistically significant differences between two groups of patients in terms of operation time, time to start a liquid diet and postoperative hospital stay (all P>0.05). (2) Postoperative complications: The early complication rates of the CS group and the LS group were 22.1% (17/77) and 18.9% (10/53), respectively, while the late complication rate were 18.2% (14/77) and 15.1% (8/53), respectively, whose differences were not statistically significant (all P>0.05). (3) Postoperative quality of life: After 1-year follow-up, 7 (5.4%) patients were lost, including 5 in CS group and 2 in LS group. One year after operation, the QLQ-C30 scale showed that the score of financial difficulty of the LS group was significantly higher than that of the CS group [33.3 (0 to 33.3) vs.0 (0 to 33.3), Z=-1.972, P=0.049] with statistically significant difference, and there were no statistically significant differences in the scores of other functional fields and symptom fields between the two groups (all P>0.05). The QLQ-STO22 scale showed that the scores of dysphagia [0 (0 to 5.6) vs. 0 (0 to 11.1), Z=-2.094, P=0.036] and eating restriction were significantly lower [0 (0 to 4.2) vs. 0 (0 to 8.3), Z=-2.011, P=0.044] in patients of the LS group than those of the CS group. There were no significant differences in scores of other symptoms between two groups (all P>0.05). Conclusions: Compared with the circular stapler, the esophagojejunostomy with linear stapler for gastric cancer patients can reduce intraoperative blood loss, shorten the time to flatus after operation, alleviate the symptoms of dysphagia and eating restriction but increase the economic burden to a certain degree.
Subject(s)
Aged, 80 and over , Humans , Gastrectomy/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Objective To observe and evaluate the clinical curative efficacy of perineal stapled prolapse resection in the treatment of complete rectal prolapse.Methods 15 patients of complete rectal prolapse were all treated by perineal stapled prolapse resection,The anal function of the patients were evaluated according to the Wexner incontinence score standard.Results All patients were successfully completed the operation.Postoperative complications:postoperative bleeding in 2 cases,anastomotic stenosis in 2 cases.These symptoms were relieved after symptomatic treatment.The anal sphincter function was improved in all patients after operation.There were no obvious incontinence.The preoperative Wexner incontinence score was 13.5±1.8,andpostoperative Wexner incontinence score was 4.2±1.5,there were significant statistical difference between them(P<0.05).The mean follow-up were 18 months(2-30 months).There was no recurrence during the follow-up period.Conclusion Perineal stapled prolapse resection as a new type of operation had small trauma,simple operation,less complications and short-term curative effect of good characteristics.They can effectively improve the symptoms of anal incontinence in patients with complete rectal prolapse.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This prospective study was conducted to compare the clinical outcomes of a 6-row 3-D linear cutter with the standard 4-row linear cutter in patients who underwent elective gastrointestinal surgery anastomosis. METHOD: Patients who underwent elective open gastrointestinal surgery that included stapled anastomosis using a linear cutter (Proximate®, Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Cincinnati, OH) between January 2011 and May 2011 were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to two groups according to the linear cutter that was used in the surgery: the standard 4-row cutter (the S group) or the new 6-row cutter (the N group). The groups were compared based on the patient demographic data, the laboratory parameters, the preoperative diagnosis, the surgery performed, the operation time, intra-or postoperative complications, the time to oral tolerance and the length of the hospital stay. RESULTS: The S group included 11 male and nine female patients with a mean age of 65 ± 12 (35-84) years, while the N group included 13 male and eight female patients with a mean age of 62 ±11 (46-79) years (p =0.448, p = 0.443, respectively). Anastomotic line bleeding was observed in eight (40%) patients in the S group and in one (4.7%) patient in the N group (p = 0.006). Dehiscence of the anastomosis line was observed in two (10%) patients in the S group and none in the N group (p =0.131). Anastomotic leakage developed in three (15%) patients in the S group and in one (4.7%) patient in the N group (p = 0.269). The mean hospital stay was 12.65 ± 6.1 days in theS group and 9.52 ± 2.9 days in the N group (p = 0.043). CONCLUSION: The 6-row 3-D linear cutter is a safe and easily applied instrument that can be used to create anastomoses in gastrointestinal surgery. The new stapler provides some usage benefits and is also superior to the standard linear cutter with regard to anastomotic line bleeding.
Subject(s)
Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/instrumentation , Surgical Staplers , Anastomosis, Surgical/instrumentation , Blood Loss, Surgical , Chi-Square Distribution , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Length of Stay , Perioperative Period , Postoperative Hemorrhage , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Time Factors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Laparoscopic gastrectomy has become widely used as a minimally invasive technique for the treatment of gastric cancer. When it was first introduced, most surgeons preferred a laparoscopic-assisted approach with a minilaparotomy rather than a totally laparoscopic procedure because of the technical challenges of achieving an intracorporeal anastomosis. Recently, with improved skills and instruments, several surgeons have reported the safety and feasibility of a totally laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis. This review describes the recent technical advances in intracorporeal anastomoses using circular and linear staplers that allow for totally laparoscopic distal, total, and proximal gastrectomies. Data that demonstrate advantages in early surgical outcomes of a total laparoscopic method compared to laparoscopic-assisted operations are also discussed.
Subject(s)
Gastrectomy , Laparotomy , Stomach NeoplasmsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Laparoscopic gastrectomy has been common treatment modality for gastric cancer. But, most surgeons tend to perform laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy using epigastric incision. Delta-shaped anastomosis is known as intracorporeal gastroduodenostomy, but it is technically difficult and needed many staplers. So we tried to find simple and economical method, here we report on the results of liner-shaped gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 25 patients who underwent totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy using liner-shaped anastomosis at School of Medicine, Ajou University between January to October 2009. The indication was early gastric cancer as diagnosed by preoperative workup, the anastomoses were performed by using laparoscopic linear stapler. RESULTS: There were 12 female and 13 male patients with a mean age of 55.6+/-11.2. The following procedures were performed 14 laparoscopic gastrectomies, 11 robotic gastrectomies. The mean operation time was 179.5+/-27.4 minutes, the mean anastomotic time was 17.5+/-3.4 minutes. The mean number of stapler cartridges was 5.6+/-0.8. Postoperative complication occurred in one patient, anastomotic stenosis, and the patient required reoperation to gastrojejunostomy. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was 6.7+/-1.0 days except the complication case, and there was no case of conversion to open procedure and postoperative mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Linear-shaped gastroduodenostomy in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy is technically simple and feasible method.
Subject(s)
Female , Humans , Male , Constriction, Pathologic , Gastrectomy , Gastric Bypass , Gastroenterostomy , Length of Stay , Medical Records , Postoperative Complications , Reoperation , Retrospective Studies , Stomach NeoplasmsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In Korea, the number of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomies for early gastric cancer patients has been on the increase. Although minimally invasive surgery is more beneficial, no reported case of a total laparoscopic gastrectomy has been reported because of difficulty with intracorporeal anastomosis. This study attempts, through our experience, to determine the safety and feasibility of a total laparoscopic gastrectomy with various types of intracorporeal anastomosis using laparoscopic linears stapler in treating early gastric carcinomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated the surgical results and clinicopatholgical characteristics of 81 patients that underwent a totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy at our department between June 2004 and May 2007. The intracorporeal anastomoses were performed by using laparoscopic linear staplers. RESULTS: The mean operative time was 287 minutes, the mean anastomotic time was 40 minutes, and the mean number of laparoscopic linear staplers used for an operation was 7.5. The mean time to the first flatus, the first food intake, and discharge from hospital was 2.9, 3.6, and 10.3 days respectively. There were 11 cases of postoperative complications, but no case of postoperative mortality or conversion to an open procedure. In 75 patients with an adenocarcinoma, the mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 38.1 and the stage distribution was as follows: stage I, 72 patients; stage II, 2 patients; stage IV, 1 patient. During the mean follow-up period of 14 months, 5 patients died of other causes and there were no cases of cancer recurrence. CONCLUSION: A total laparoscopic gastrectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis by using a laparoscopic linear stapler was found to be safe and feasible. We were able to obtain acceptable surgical outcomes in terms of minimal invasiveness.
Subject(s)
Humans , Adenocarcinoma , Conversion to Open Surgery , Eating , Flatulence , Follow-Up Studies , Gastrectomy , Korea , Laparoscopy , Lymph Nodes , Mortality , Operative Time , Postoperative Complications , Recurrence , Stomach Neoplasms , Minimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & PURPOSE: The most popular anastomotic method for a Billroth-II gastrectomy is an 'Albert-Lembert' type two-layer gastro jejunostomy (G-Jstomy) which seems more secure than a 'Gambee' type single-layer anastomosis which provides better mucosal apposition. Since 1995, I have used linear-type staplers during a Billroth-II gastrectomy and palliative bypass surgery for gastric cancer patients to make the G-Jstomy more convenient. There use shortened the operating time and made the gastrojejunostomy easier. I reviewed four years of stapling experience to prove the merits of a stapled G-Jstomy so as to encourage the surgeons who hesitate to do so for fear of complications. METHODS: 1,049 Billroth-II gastrectomies and 133 palliative gastrojejunostomies were carried out from January 1995 to December 1998 at Asan Medical Center. A linear stapler was used in 319 of the above procedures. RESULTS: A linear stapler with two rows of staples was used without any anastomotic leakage or hemorrhage. However, I experienced several efferent jejunal loop obstructions due to adhesion around the anastomosis at the beginning of the trial. All the adhesions occurred at the suture materials of stapler port which was closed manually. No more obstructions were observed after modifying the location of and the closing method for the stapler port. Nowadays, conventional manual G-Jstomy has been safely replaced with a stapled G-Jstomy. CONCLUSION: This report of a clinical trial offers a safe technique for a stapled G-Jstomy by solving the pitfalls.